Joined: Aug 21, 2007 Posts: 9762 Location: The Republic of Texas
Status:
Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 4:58 pm Post subject: Goodell: NFL could ban 3-point stance
Goodell: NFL could ban 3-point stance
Updated Feb 7, 2010 5:09 PM ET
A ban on the three-point stance? NFL commissioner Roger Goodell says it's possible.
Concerned about concussions, Goodell said the league will keep looking for ways to make the game safer. Speaking on CBS's "Face the Nation" hours before the Super Bowl, he didn't rule out the idea of banning the three-point stance for linemen to reduce the ferocity of collisions at the line of scrimmage.
"As you'll see tonight, you'll see a lot of players that never get down in a three-point stance," Goodell said Sunday. "So it's possible that would happen."
While science is still trying to determine the long-term effects of concussions, Goodell said, the league has made progress in increasing awareness about the severity of such injuries.
"For many years the culture had been quite different - that concussions weren't serious injuries," he said. "I think we have changed that culture and made sure that people understand they are serious, and they can have serious consequences if they're not treated properly."
Goodell has met with NFL competition committee co-chair Rich McKay to begin evaluating possible rules changes.
Another priority for Goodell is the league's stalled labor negotiations. He predicted players' salaries will still grow under a new agreement, even if their share of revenue is reduced as owners have proposed.
Goodell said the owners need more money to cover rising costs for international ventures and infrastructure projects such as new stadiums.
"You have to invest in these stadiums that we're in today," the commissioner said. "You need to find new ways of creating revenue, whether it's international or otherwise. And that takes investment. And we need to make sure that the owners have the capital to be able to do that. And then the pie grows, and everyone benefits."
The union has said management wants players to reduce their share to 41 percent of applied revenues from about 59 percent. Goodell counters that of the $3.6 billion in incremental revenues since 2006, players received $2.6 billion.
"We want to structure something that really is going to lead us into the next decade in a way that's constructive, so the players benefit, the teams benefit, and most of all, the game," Goodell said.
The league's current labor contract expires in March 2011. NFL Players Association executive director DeMaurice Smith said Thursday the chance of a lockout next year is "14" on a scale of 1 to 10.
"I don't agree with that," Goodell said. "The owners don't win by having a lockout. Shutting down your business is not good for anybody. And it's certainly not good for the players. It's certainly not good for the fans."
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 3:25 am Post subject: Re: Goodell: NFL could ban 3-point stance
I don't want to sound insensitive to the long term effects of concussions, but... it's football, dammit. They know what they're signing up for and get paid millions to do it. Besides, is it me or are there already far fewer concussions nowadays? KJJ is right-- why not just make it a flag football league?
Joined: Aug 21, 2007 Posts: 2194 Location: Meridian, TX
Status:
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 7:22 am Post subject: Re: Goodell: NFL could ban 3-point stance
Wouldn't it be smarter and easier to strike the word concussion from the dictionary and ban any research on long term effects of "bell rung" events in professional athletes?
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 11:54 am Post subject: Re: Goodell: NFL could ban 3-point stance
If these politically correct shitheads keep dumbing down the game, I'm going to quit watching NFL football. They've already put girl dresses on QBs--or might as well have with their panty-waist rules.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
NAV
